I seem to have mild aversion, not very strong, to starting the leaking project more seriously, with the reason being boredom?
Reasoning about minutae of redaction policies is, beyond a point, quite boring.
On one hand, this is literally a matter of life or death.
People will live or die by the choices I make. Assange literally got people killed while he was still operating, and that will be on his conscience even today.
As a founder, one of my primary roles will be figuring out the morality aka redaction policy so our group doesn't splinter apart.
On a bigger picture, the destruction of all life on Earth is on my head, and my response to that is, solving this is boring? Are you fucking kidding me? I wanna just shout at myself so hard for that.
My desire for novelty is too fucking high, man. I need to figure out some project where I believe in it enough that I can just grind through the boring parts. Considering my insatiable desire for novel work, it seems likely I will have to at some part of just force myself through the drudgery. That is the only way to get good work out of me.
Visakanv might be wrong lol. The maximally fun project is not the maximally impactful project. Idk, PG also says follow curiosity. I wish these people backed up their shit with more examples, and more importantly, counterexamples. That might make me take them more seriously. I literally don't have time to do a meta-analysis of all great work ever, to check if any of them is right. Important, ask gpt-5 tomorrow to do the meta-analysis.
Subscribe
Enter email or phone number to subscribe. You will receive atmost one update per month